New research reveals the best attack lines to use against Reform

How to stop Farage...

Jul 15, 2025

I’m an independent investigative reporter focused on exposing the populist elite – in particular Farage and Reform.

There are thousands of people signed up for updates. I hope you’ll consider joining. It’s free!

It’s the burning question of British politics right now: is Nigel Farage’s momentum unstoppable? And if not, how can his march to Downing Street be curtailed?

A new study released today addresses this very issue – delivering some interesting conclusions.

The research, commissioned by the non-partisan think tank Persuasion UK, tested the impact of various anti-Reform attack lines on 6,000 UK adults.

Five groups were each presented with a different attack line – criticising Reform’s anti-asylum approach, its denial of climate facts, Farage’s support for NHS privatisation, the party’s fossil fuel donors, and its closeness to U.S. President Donald Trump.

Those involved in the experiment were surveyed before and after they were presented with the information, to assess Reform’s potential vulnerabilities.

One of the attack lines towered above the rest, according to Steve Akehurst, who was behind the research. His analysis points out that “by far the most impactful” message – in terms of damaging Reform’s popularity – was exposing its extensive ties to fossil fuel interests and corporate donors.

Persuasion UK presented one group with the findings I revealed last year – that, between 2019 and 2024, Reform received more than 90% of its funding, £2.3 million, from individuals and companies linked to polluting industries and climate science denial.

Bringing this information to the attention of voters pushed down Farage’s popularity and “was the only message to significantly reduce willingness to vote for Reform”.

Akehurst reckons this attack line was particularly effective because “it tapped into a general mood of cynicism to politicians and hostility to big business”. He said that it also provided “an explanatory framework” for why Farage advocates for lower taxes on the rich and the rolling back of workers’ rights – not to mention his fanatical opposition to clean energy.

Farage’s shtick is to pose as a champion of the working man, fighting against out-of-touch elites and corrupt institutions. But this new research shows the importance of exposing Farage’s foundational myth: namely, that Reform isn’t a grassroots rebellion; it’s a vehicle bankrolled by the financiers who crashed the economy in 2008 and the austerity-obsessed corporate vandals who have profited ever since.

When you expose these facts – as this Substack (and all of my work) is dedicated to doing – Farage loses support. When these stories come to people’s attention, the Farage fallacy starts to make sense; it becomes palpably obvious that his agenda is dressed up as an anti-establishment crusade while being paid-for by corporate interests.

One other attack line also significantly dented Reform’s support, according to the research: Farage’s relationship with Donald Trump. When this fact was highlighted to the group, Farage’s favourability fell by 10.6 percentage points, and Reform’s favourability by 8 points.

Farage doesn’t seem to be suffering from this fact in the polls currently. However, as the election drags nearer, and the President’s demagoguery becomes ever-clearer, Farage’s decision to be Trump’s closest European ally could become a major electoral hindrance.

As Akehurst states: “Contrary to what you’d think from various parts of the media, Trump is deeply unpopular in the UK including with some Reform voters... Using Farage’s personal closeness to Trump to make an argument about his ideological closeness, and what that means for the country, proves damaging to Reform.”

As for the other anti-Reform attack lines – on the NHS, asylum, and climate denial – none really dented Farage’s support. There was even some evidence that attacking Farage over his asylum extremism increased the salience of immigration as an issue and actually increased the level of sympathy for Reform among the voters surveyed.

These are crucial insights for Farage’s opponents. Rather than chasing Farage on immigration or parroting his populism, they should pull back the curtain and show the financial machinery behind Reform’s rise.

Because what cuts through, this research shows, is the fact that Farage’s party isn’t anti-establishment – it’s just a new front for the same old elite.

Of course it’s difficult to spread these facts, when the media is owned by the same elite that is funding Farage’s outfit. But through publications like this one, we can at least make a start.

“One of our finest investigative journalists”
– Peter Oborne

Five reasons to subscribe

Exposing Farage

My work focuses on exposing the rich and powerful – namely, how they are trying to impose their narrow-minded mindset on the UK: demonising immigrants, fawning over Trump, and paving the way for a second era of austerity. I specialise in exposing their donors, their networks, and their ideologies.

Investigative experience

I’ve written for the New York Times, The Guardian, the BBC, The Mirror, Led By Donkeys, and a host of other outlets. I was the first journalist to reveal that Michelle Mone’s company, PPE Medpro, had been handed £122 million in Covid contracts.

I know how to root-out stories and find the facts. That means you will be receiving key investigations and insights before anyone else.

Uncovering what others won’t

A few notable exceptions aside, the legacy media isn’t willing or able to investigate the rich and powerful. Their obsession with “balance” over truth has led them to platform the very people to blame for our current mess.

It’s free

It’s completely free to join my Substack. The overwhelming majority of my articles are free to read, and always will be. If you want to support my work or access paywalled articles, that’s a massive help, but it’s by no means obligatory. You’re also welcome to unsubscribe at any time.